Instead, Chomsky argues in Manufacturing Consent—his
1988 critique of “the political economy of the mass media” with Edward
S. Herman—that the mass media sells us the idea that we have political
agency. Their “primary function… in the United States is to mobilize
support for the special interests that dominate the government and the
private sector.” Those interests may have changed or evolved quite a bit
since 1988, but the mechanisms of what Chomsky and Herman identify as
“effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a
system-supportive propaganda function” might function in the age of
Twitter just as they did in one dominated by network and cable news.
Those mechanisms largely divide into what the authors called the “Five Filters.” The video at the top of the post, narrated by Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman, provides a quick introduction to the five, in a jarring animated sequence that’s part Monty Python, part Residents video. See the five filters listed below in brief, with excerpts from Goodman’s commentary: [...]
Chomsky and Herman’s book offers a surgical analysis of the ways
corporate mass media “manufactures consent” for a status quo the
majority of people do not actually want. Yet for all of the recent
agonizing over mass media failure and complicity, we don’t often hear
references to Manufacturing Consent
these days. This may have something to do with the book’s dated
examples, or it may testify to Chomsky’s marginalization in mainstream
political discourse, though he would be the first to note that his voice
has not been suppressed.
No comments:
Post a Comment