The challenge that the multiverse poses for
the idea of an all-good, all-powerful God is often focused on
fine-tuning. If there are infinite universes, then we don’t need a fine
tuner to explain why the conditions of our universe are perfect for
life, so the argument goes. But some kinds of multiverse pose a more
direct threat. The many-worlds interpretation of quantum physicist Hugh
Everett III and the modal realism of cosmologist Max Tegmark include
worlds that no sane, good God would ever tolerate. The theories are very
different, but each predicts the existence of worlds filled with horror
and misery. [...]
But in the 1950s, Everett proposed a bold alternative. His theory has no
collapses, but instead holds that all the parts of these combined—or
“superposed”—states occur as parts of equally real but relatively
isolated worlds. There are some complete copies of the universe in which
the coin lands heads, and in others tails. And this applies to all
other physical states—not just flipping coins. There are some universes
where you make the train and get to work on time, and others where you
don’t, and so on. These slight differences create multiple overlapping
universes, all branching off from some initial state in a great
world-tree.[...]
Even if the pruning argument doesn’t work, there is another reason to
think that the many-worlds interpretation doesn’t pose a serious threat
to belief in God. Everett’s multiverse is just a much expanded physical
world like this one, and finding we were in it would be like finding we
were in a world with many more inhabited planets, some the amplified
versions of the worst parts of our planet and others the amplified
versions of the best parts. And so, even the worst parts of an
Everettian multiverse are just particularly ugly versions of planet
Earth. If an afterlife helps to explain our seemingly pointless
suffering, then it would help explain the seemingly pointless suffering
in even the worst of these Everett worlds, if we suppose that everyone
in every branch, shows up in an afterlife.
No comments:
Post a Comment