Those words epitomize an important, but controversial question: is
someone who acts violently in the name of a faith truly a member of that
faith? According to recently highlighted data from the Public Religion Research Institute
(PRRI)—which focuses primarily on Christian responses to that yes/no
question—potential answers may result in a “double standard.” Christians
are more likely to say that other Christians acting violently are not
true Christians, while failing to provide the same latitude for Muslims.[...]
According to PRRI, 50 percent of
Americans in general say that violence in the name of Islam does not
represent Islam—75 percent say the same of Christianity. The numbers
shift, however, the more specific the demographic gets, creating the
alleged “double standard.” White mainline Protestants (77 percent) and
Catholics (79 percent) reject the idea that true Christians act
violently, with 41 percent and 58 percent respectively being willing to
say the same of Muslims.
White
evangelicals stand out the most, having what PRRI calls the “larger
double-standard”—87 percent disown Christians who commit violent acts,
with only 44 percent willing to say the same about Muslims. [...]
“Unless a person is being intentionally deceitful, someone who claims to be acting on the basis of religious fervor should be treated as an adherent to that religion. I do not get to judge whether or not a person is ‘really’ of their faith. As a Christian I can only try to persuade other Christians as to why certain behaviors are incompatible with the Christian faith.”
read the article
“Unless a person is being intentionally deceitful, someone who claims to be acting on the basis of religious fervor should be treated as an adherent to that religion. I do not get to judge whether or not a person is ‘really’ of their faith. As a Christian I can only try to persuade other Christians as to why certain behaviors are incompatible with the Christian faith.”
read the article
No comments:
Post a Comment