6 December 2016

Quartz: The rise of Modi and Trump actually reflects the revolt of the elite, not the poor as claimed

Comparisons with Indian prime minister Narendra Modi whose rise predates Trump’s by two years, are inevitable. The two leaders share an evident admiration for each other. Both are hugely popular among their respective constituencies—Hindu nationalists for Modi and white supremacists for Trump—and highly resented by those who disagree with them. Both are polarising figures, who espouse deeply divisive agendas. Despite their many similarities, however, they are also remarkably different in important ways.

First, the commonalities. Modi and Trump are both powerful orators who connect well with their audiences. They speak with rhetorical flourishes, cleverly appropriating popular discontent with existing governments. Humour is key to their communication as they drive home their propaganda. Both show themselves to be strong leaders who can get things done. They deride the complex bureaucratic mechanisms that have come to characterise the polities of their respective countries. [...]

Both are shrewd strategists. They exploited the first-past-the-post system to their advantage so that even as they won a minority of the popular vote—Modi and his allies won less than 40%, Trump, 46.7%—they also secured thumping majorities in the legislatures and steered their respective parties to comfortable victories. [...]

Despite their similarities, it is important not to overlook the differences between the two men, particularly in their personal backgrounds, political experience and attitudes towards globalisation.

No comments:

Post a Comment